**I'm having some problems understanding Badiou's definition of the envelope, and of the operation of union. Any help with this will be appreciated.In the course of developing the transcendental algebra (LW, Book II, Section 3, Subsection 6) Badiou stipulates that the envelope of any given subset of T (defined by a certain property P) must obey the following two properties:- It is greater than or equal than all the elements q of T that have property P.- It is lesser than or equal to every element t which, like itself, is greater than or equal to all the elements q with property P (least upper bound)Immediately afterwards Badiou stipulates that given a two element set B (p, q) then an upper bound would be greater than p or q. Then he stipulates that the envelope of this set would be the smallest of all elements greater than or equal to both p and q. I’m confused about this; how is it possible for the envelope of any non-empty set not to be the greatest element of that set? We have the following:(1) B = {q ε T / P(q)} (The definition of the subset of T defined by property P)(2) µ = ∑{q ε T / P(q)} (Definition of the envelope)The envelope µ must be defined by the following properties:(3) µ ≥ {p / P(p)} .∩. µ ≤ [t / t = ≥{p / P(p)}] (the envelope of B is equal to the smallest upper bound for B)We stipulate by hypothesis that B is not empty, i.e. at least one element belongs to it.(4) (B ≠ Ø) ↔ (Eq) (q ε B) ∩ (Vp) (p ε B) ∩ ( p ≤ q) (B is non-empty and is the largest element of B)(5) P(q) [By definition of B, (1)]Then we stipulate by hypothesis that the envelope µ is greater than all q that belong to B.(6) µ > {q ε B .↔. P(q)}But since we know that at least one q belongs to B, which is the greatest element in B, while also is smaller than µ, then being equal to itself, q satisfies (3), i.e. it obeys the two conditions required for the envelope.(3) ∩ (1) ∩ (6) --> (7) (q < µ) .∩. q ↔ [q ≥ {p / P(p)} .∩. ≤ [t / t = ≥ {p / P(p)}]]So it appears that q is both an upper bound (since it is equal to all the elements of B, being the largest element of that set)and the minimum upper bound, since it is equal to the maximum member in B. But by the definition of the envelope as the minimum upper bound for B it appears as if(3) ∩ (7) ∩ (6) --> (q = µ) ∩ (µ > q)So we arrive, it would appear, to a formal contradiction.How could the union of p and q be thus a third element, greater than both? Since in every non empty set, there will be an element which is the greatest, it would follow it would always be the envelope, it seems. I think what may be missing would be the additional restrictive clause whereby if a set has a maximal value, then the envelope will be that value. Put it obversely, if a set there is no maximal value, then the envelope of that set will the least upper bound (for Badiou the distinction between 'lesser' and 'minimum' does not seem to be important, since what we are measuring is always degrees of intensity of appearance). If so then maybe we could rewrite (6) as µ ≥ {q ε B .↔. P(q)} and all would be fine, since we would end up identifying µ with q. **

## viernes, 10 de julio de 2009

### Wouldn’t Every Envelope be the Greatest Element of a given Subset?

Etiquetas:
Badiou,
envelope,
logics of worlds,
the transcendental

Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)

## 3 comentarios:

puta broder yo solo tengo una cosa que decirte manyas, chupame el trozo manyas

Hello !.

might , perhaps very interested to know how one can manage to receive high yields .

There is no initial capital needed You may start to receive yields with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you thought of all the time

The company represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

It is based in Panama with structures around the world.

Do you want to become an affluent person?

That`s your choice That`s what you wish in the long run!

I`m happy and lucky, I started to get real money with the help of this company,

and I invite you to do the same. If it gets down to choose a correct companion utilizes your savings in a right way - that`s AimTrust!.

I take now up to 2G every day, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!

It`s easy to start , just click this link http://ajuziquke.s-enterprize.com/ehawaj.html

and lucky you`re! Let`s take this option together to feel the smell of real money

Hello !.

You may , probably curious to know how one can collect a huge starting capital .

There is no need to invest much at first. You may start earning with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich

The firm incorporates an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

Its head office is in Panama with affiliates everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.

Do you want to become a happy investor?

That`s your choice That`s what you desire!

I`m happy and lucky, I started to take up real money with the help of this company,

and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to select a correct partner utilizes your money in a right way - that`s it!.

I take now up to 2G every day, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!

It`s easy to join , just click this link http://asonykyde.bigheadhosting.net/obonyd.html

and go! Let`s take this option together to become rich

Publicar un comentario